All digital signals produce abrupt changes as they go from a zero to a one and vice versa. It is this digital abruptness and the very high analog harmonic frequency sets that make up a digital state change that to me seems to have a hammer effect on the plasma of a living cell.

Of course in practice the abruptness is smoothed out by implementing only the minimal requirements for a state change that produces the intended intelligence to be carried by the signal.

Still I cannot believe these abrupt state changes are pathologically neutral or more specifically that they don’t alter the natural frequency harmonics of our living cell plasma.

Our cells may literally be forced to ‘dance’ to the tune of the digital signals which pervade out atmosphere from so many sources. This may alter our rate of breathing, our heartrate, our brain waves, etc.

The upshot to all of this, as bizarre as it sounds, may be that ultimately our physiologies may ‘prefer’ digitally provided messages from the communication taking place between our brain and body to the politically delivered orations transmitted by digital format.

As an example, we won’t listen to our next door neighbour in a face-to-face chat because his speech is delivered in an analog fashion, but we will listen to the president of the unites states when he tells us over our plasma digital TV that such and such new laws are required for such and such a reason.

I have been made aware this year of something climatologists have been QUIETLY debating, which explains the phenomena that originally inflamed the global warming frenzy. You are both old enough to remember that at the end of the 1960’s/early 1970’s the news was screaming that an ice age was coming…30 years later we are screaming that the world is burning up!

Both are understood as being the ends of 30 year (or so) temperature variations called “The Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO).” I have several references below, but this is apparently quite well accepted as a real phenomenon, probably completely unrelated to human activity.

The PDO predicts cooler air and off-coast North American water temps during the cool cycle (1947-1977 or so) and the opposite–a warming cycle–from 1977 to 2007 (or so).

There is lots of evidence for this, not the least of which are the event you report in this episode, excessively cool temperatures, crop problems, etc.

In fact, some scientists have stated that given warming and cooling, one would PREFER warmer…because would could do something about it. Cooling is possible, at least in theory, via cloud formation, the Barium you suggest, placing soot in the atmosphere, satellite reflectors, etc. But there is no mechanism for warming the planet that we know of. I emailed you links to science stories that hopefully have gotten through.

Of course Al Gore has not recanted…yet!

You both are doing a great work. Don’t get discouraged!
Keep it going.
I forward your stuff often.
I promise to donate.
Take care,
Mario